At no point in time during the lon smith defendants august 15 2011 conversation with the reyelts did the lon smith defendants through their agents or otherwise indicate that the reyelts owed anything beyond the tendered amount of 1 176 00 under the agreement or indicate that the lon smith defendants would pursue the remaining balance of.
Reyelts v lon smith roofing.
And a 1 systems inc d b a lon smith roofing and construction.
Rick disney lawyer for lon smith responded to the watchdog in a written statement.
The reyeltses like the keys filed suit against lon smith associates inc.
It remains to be seen if this new legislation and the recent decision in reyelts v.
Lon smith roofing provided the reyelts a high quality roof and they have never complained even once about.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm 8 soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally.
The problems for lon smith roofing started with the 2013 ruling in reyelts v.
Will bring about a change in how roofing contractors market and.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm 8 soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally visited the homeowners offering their roofing services including an assessment of the hail damage and assistance with the insurance claim.
Except for i think 1 176 neither the reyelts nor the insurance company paid anything to lon smith roofing for their roof lon smith is lucky in one respect.
In the reyelts opinion these defendants are collectively referred to as the lon smith defendants while here we refer to them as the parties do as lsrc.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al 1 in reyelts the homeowners agreed to hire lon smith roofing and signed an.